Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid
Дата
Msg-id 5320.1463079212@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> My suggestion is that we switch from using a List to marshal the data
> to using an ExtensibleNode.  An advantage of that is that we'd have
> some in-core test coverage for the ExtensibleNode stuff.  In theory it
> ought to be simpler and less messy, too, but I guess we'll find out.

Seems like a good idea, or at least one worth trying.

> Regardless of what approach we take, I disagree that this needs to be
> fixed in 9.6.

Agreed.  This is only a cosmetic issue, and it's only going to be visible
to a very small group of people, so we can leave it alone until 9.7.

(FWIW, now that we've put in the list_make5 macros, I'd vote against
taking them out, independently of what happens in postgres_fdw.
Somebody else will need them someday, or indeed might already be
using them in some non-core extension.)
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: alter table alter column ... (larger type) ... when there are dependent views
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Does Type Have = Operator?