Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 531FAE4A.6050600@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/11/2014 06:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Mind you, I wouldn't be unhappy to see it go away; it's a kluge and always > has been. I'm just expecting lots of push-back if we try. And it's kind > of hard to resist push-back when you don't have a substitute to offer. Yeah, what we really need is encapsulated per-DB users and local superusers. I think every agrees that this is the goal, but nobody wants to put in the work to implement a generalized solution. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: