On 03/10/2014 12:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> On 03/10/2014 11:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I've committed this patch now with a few further tweaks, leaving this
>>> issue unaddressed. It may well be something that needs improvement,
>>> but I don't think it's a big enough issue to justify holding back a
>>> commit.
>>
>> Wait, does this mean Changesets is committed? Or only part of it?
>
> The core of the feature was b89e151054a05f0f6d356ca52e3b725dd0505e53,
> but that only allowed it through the SQL interface. The new commit,
> 8722017bbcbc95e311bbaa6d21cd028e296e5e35, makes it available via
> walsender interface. There isn't a client for that interface yet, but
> if you're wondering whether it's time to break out the champagne, I'm
> thinking probably.
Yeah, that's my thoughts. Although I might wait for recvlogical. Will
put documentation wordsmithing on my todo list once Andres commits.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com