On 03/03/2014 05:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> Primary value is that in theory the hstore2 opclasses are available
>> *now*, as opposed to a year from now.
>
> Well, yes, that's right. Although we cannot assume that VODKA will get
> into 9.5 - it's a big project. Nor is it obvious to me that a
> VODKA-ized set of operator classes would not bring with them exactly
> the same dilemma as we now face vis-a-vis hstore code reuse and GIN
> operator classes. So it seems reasonable to me to suppose that VODKA
> should not influence our decision here. Please correct me if I'm
> mistaken.
I would agree with you.
Andrew was onsite with a client over the weekend, which is why you
haven't heard from him on this thread.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com