Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged"

On 03/03/2014 05:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
...
>> ISTR the discussion going something along the lines of "we'd have to WAL
>> log the entire table to do that, and if we have to do that, what's the
>> point?".
> IIRC, the reason you'd have to do that is to make the table contents
> appear on slave servers.  If you don't consider replication then it might
> seem easier.
So switch on logging and then perform CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL ?

Should this work, or is something extra needed ?

Cheers

-- 
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Consultant
Performance, Scalability and High Availability
2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ