Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> writes:
> I don't agree. I think that regular indexing is mandatory under some
> workloads. Example:
> ...
> There are some additional indexes that I've snipped from the output that also
> saw some benefit from reindexing, but let's just focus on file_fp_idx.
Can you describe the usage pattern of that index? I'm curious why it
doesn't maintain reasonably static size. How often is the underlying
table vacuumed?
regards, tom lane