On Sun, July 4, 2010 9:58 am, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> BTW, we intentionally didn't put any provision for parameters into DO
> originally. What's changed to alter that decision?
>
Nothing that I know of, I think there is just a little impatience here. I
think the consensus was that we needed to get some experience of DO in the
field before looking at a parameter mechanism. I still think that's the
correct position.
cheers
andrew