Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rob Sargent
Тема Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements
Дата
Msg-id 52F154B4.2090606@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements  (AlexK <alkuzo@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements  (AlexK <alkuzo@gmail.com>)
Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 02/04/2014 01:52 PM, AlexK wrote:
Every row of my table has a double[] array of approximately 30K numbers. I
have ran a few tests, and so far everything looks good.

I am not pushing the limits here, right? It should be perfectly fine to
store arrays of 30k double numbers, correct?



--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-reasonable-to-store-double-arrays-of-30K-elements-tp5790562.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


What sorts of tests and what sorts of results?
Each record has something like 30000*16 + 30000*(per cell overhead, which could be zero) but that is definitely spilling over to toast.  Have you done any large scale deletes?


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Sergey Konoplev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The timezone oddities
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The timezone oddities