Union-ifying RangeTblEntry
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Union-ifying RangeTblEntry |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 52E74B9C.6010107@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Union-ifying RangeTblEntry
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all I'm about to have to add _another_ flag to RangeTblEntry, to track row-security expansion. In the process I noticed the comment: /* * XXX the fields applicable to only some rte kinds should be * merged into a union. I didn't do this yet becausethe diffs * would impact a lot of code that is being actively worked on. * FIXME someday. */ and it struck me that the end of the 9.4 commitfest might be a reasonable time to do this now that PstgreSQL is subject to "pulsed" development with commitfests. As part of that, a number of the flag fields on RangeTblEntry into a bitfield. Comments? -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: