Re: new json funcs

On 01/24/2014 03:40 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> For consistency with the existing json functions (json_each, 
> json_each_text, etc.) it might be better to add separate 
> json_to_record_text and json_to_recordset_text functions in place of 
> the nested_as_text parameter to json_to_record and json_to_recordset.
>
>

It wouldn't be consistent with json_populate_record() and 
json_populate_recordset(), the two closest relatives, however.

And yes, I appreciate that we have not been 100% consistent. Community 
design can be a bit messy that way.

cheers

andrew