Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 52E1A1F6.9090008@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Why do we let autovacuum give up? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/23/2014 02:55 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 01/23/2014 02:17 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> FWIW, I have a patch around somewhere that I never cleaned up properly for >> submissions that simply added a counter to pg_stat_user_tables indicating >> how many times vacuum had aborted on that specific table. If that's enough >> info (it was for my case) to cover this case, I can try to dig it out >> again and clean it up... > > It would be 100% more information than we currently have. How much more > difficult would it be to count completed autovacuums as well? It's > really the ratio of the two which matters ... Actually, now that I think about it, the ratio of the two doesn't matter as much as whether the most recent autovacuum aborted or not. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: