Re: revisiting unix domain sockets

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Charles Pritchard
Тема Re: revisiting unix domain sockets
Дата
Msg-id 52DDB69D.1000008@jumis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: revisiting unix domain sockets  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Ответы Re: revisiting unix domain sockets  (Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Дерево обсуждения
Here's a quick diff if anyone is interested.
https://gist.github.com/Downchuck/8531692

Needs JNA in the class path. Seems to work.

We've released this under the same license as pgjdbc.
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/blob/master/LICENSE

Uses ?unixSocket= as the parameter for the path.


-Charles


On 12/17/2013 4:25 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
Send a PR and I'll look at it.

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
Has there been any movement and-or push back around supporting unix domain sockets within the connection string? I've seen simple patches on the web to add support- it seems like a trivial matter, is there a design consideration or other issue outstanding?

Example of using JNA for unix domain sockets:
http://www.productivity.org/projects/mysqlunixsocket/MysqlUnixSocketFactory.java

-Charles


--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc


В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Nelson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: StringBuffer vs. StringBuilder
Следующее
От: Jeremy Whiting
Дата:
Сообщение: Master branch compile error using 1.5 spec.