Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bossart, Nathan
Тема Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Дата
Msg-id 52DA3827-E459-4C54-A603-B3C2C3418732@amazon.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 11/18/21, 8:27 PM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's the v4 patch with the above changes, the output looks like [1].
> Please review it further.

I agree with Tom.  I would just s/server/backend/ (as per the
attached) and call it a day.

Nathan
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RecoveryInProgress() has critical side effects