Re: Standalone synchronous master

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: Standalone synchronous master
Дата
Msg-id 52CDD697.7000800@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Standalone synchronous master  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Standalone synchronous master  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 01/08/2014 02:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:

>> db0->db1 in synchronous mode
>>
>> The idea is that we know that data on db0 is not written until we know for a
>> fact that db1 also has that data. That is great and a guarantee of data
>> integrity between the two nodes.
>
> That guarantee is never there. The only thing guaranteed is that the
> client isn't notified of the commit until db1 has received the data.

Well ugh on that.. but that is for another reply.

>
> That's why you should configure a second standby as another (candidate)
> synchronous replica, also listed in synchronous_standby_names.

I don't have a response to this that does not involve a great deal of 
sarcasm.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary 
act.", George Orwell



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Erik Rijkers"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: nested hstore patch (sgml typo)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Standalone synchronous master