Re: Proposal: variant of regclass

On 12/31/2013 02:38 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Before proceeding the work, I would like to make sure that followings
> are complete list of new functions. Inside parentheses are
> corresponding original functions.
>
> toregproc (regproc)
> toregoper (regoper)
> toregclass (regclass)
> toregtype (regtype)

Pardon the bikeshedding, but those are hard to read for me.  I would
prefer to go with the to_timestamp() model and add an underscore to
those names.

-- 
Vik