Re: use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6
| От | Inoue, Hiroshi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 52A660E2.8060709@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6 (Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-odbc |
Hi Pavel, (2013/12/06 19:58), Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hi, our regular package checking discovered that in postgresql-odbc is > using inet_addr() call (which is not ipv6 compliant). I tried to look at > it and it was used just for parsing of ipv4 addresses. It is not a big > deal (the worst thing what can happen is that ipv6 addresses will cost a > little bit more time to be resolved). > > Better solution would be imo to use inet_pton() call for both ipv4 and > ipv6 address families. Patch is attached, any comment is welcome! Thanks for the patch. I will take care of it. regards, Hiroshi Inoue -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. SPAMfighter has removed 1069 of my spam emails to date. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: