Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we have a few TODO items here:
>> 
>> * Invent ... and document ... an API that permits safe assembly of a
>> parameter list from non-constant (and perhaps untrustworthy) values.
>> 
>> * Fix xslt_process' failure to report (some?) errors detected by libxslt.
>> 
>> * Move the functionality to a less deprecated place.
>> 
>> None of these are within the scope of the current patch though.

> Should any of these be added to our TODO list under XML?

Yes, all of them, since nothing's been done about any of 'em ...
        regards, tom lane