Re: Sequence Access Method WIP

On 11/25/13 12:00, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 25 November 2013 04:01, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>> The proposed changes to alloc() would still suffer from all the problems
>> that I complained about. Adding a new API alongside doesn't help with that.
>
> You made two proposals. I suggested implementing both.
>
> What would you have me do?

Dunno. I do know that the proposed changes to alloc() are not a good 
API. You could implement the other API, I think that has a chance of 
being a cleaner API, but looking at the BDR extension that would use 
that facility, I'm not sure how useful that would be for you. (and I'd 
really like to see an actual implementation of whatever API we come up 
with, before we commit to maintaining it).

- Heikki