Re: additional json functionality

On 11/15/2013 04:00 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> Looking at this a different way: could we just implement BSON and leave json
> alone?
> 
> http://bsonspec.org/

In short?  No.

For one thing, our storage format is different from theirs (better,
frankly), and as a result is not compliant with their "standard".

That's a reason why we won't use the name BSON, either, since it's a
trademark of 10gen.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com