Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Laurenz Albe
Тема Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Дата
Msg-id 528512f699cc4acc24d8c8195e53ed3e4e699159.camel@cybertec.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Ответы Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 08:19 +0000, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > I think you should pst another patch where the second, now superfluous, error
> > message is removed.
>
> Updated. This patch showed no failure during regression tests
> and has been aligned by pgindent.

Looks good to me.
I'll set it to "ready for committer" again.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Neil Chen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)