Re: PG 19 release notes and authors
| От | Joe Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PG 19 release notes and authors |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 527f3723-3e8e-47a6-8a1f-07e862a1de20@joeconway.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PG 19 release notes and authors (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PG 19 release notes and authors
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/6/26 09:40, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2026 at 04:09:57PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote: >> On 2026-Apr-05, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > I am not sure PG 19 follows this, but we might want to follow it going >> > forward. >> >> More and more I am getting the feeling that the commit guidance is >> actually misguided. The document itself is not very good (I mean, why >> use XML-lookalike to represent a commit message, which is regular >> English prose??); and I don't feel it represents actual consensus. > > I agree I am not a fan of the XML, but Joe Conway introduced it and I > didn't object. I am by no means married to it -- feel free to improve it however everyone prefers. >> > A larger issue is that since we now have links to the commits in the >> > release notes, there might no longer be a need to list _any_ names next >> > to the release note items. >> >> I don't understand your motivation for saying things like these. > > Uh, I am asking if something is still useful due to recent changes and > can be removed as useless. I don't think it is useless and I do think it would be a loss in several ways to the community. But I also recognize that it takes a great deal of effort to do, so I understand why it is worth asking the question. -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: