On 10/31/13, 6:42 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Hello, This patch might be too complicated (and seems somewhat ad
> hoc) for the gain, but more index usage for this kind of
> operation should be worth doing.
There is a new compiler warning:
setrefs.c: In function ‘set_plan_refs’:
setrefs.c:782:7: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
[enabled by default]