On 10/24/2013 04:15 AM, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> If we do what you are suggesting, it seems like a single line patch to me.
> In XLogSaveBufferForHint(), we probably need to look at this additional GUC
> to decide whether or not to backup the block.
Wait, what? Why are we having an additional GUC?
I'm opposed to the idea of having a GUC to enable failback. When would
anyone using replication ever want to disable that?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com