Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> If we are leaning towards a more comprehensive fix in v18, ISTM we should
> go ahead and revert commit 562bee0 (both for master and v17). Or am I
> misinterpreting the proposed path forward here?
That seems like a reasonable thing to do now, since we have a
complaint about v17's behavior and there seems no compelling
reason why v17 has to address this ancient issue.
regards, tom lane