Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL
| От | Marko Tiikkaja |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 523AECFE.50206@joh.to обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/18/13 5:11 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > In this code a assert fail can be lost in app log. Or can be knowingly > handled and ignored - what is wrong, and should not be allowed. > > When I wrote a little bit complex procedures, I had to use a EXCEPTION WHEN > OTHERS clause - because I would not to lost a transaction. It worked, but > searching a syntax errors was significantly harder - so on base of this > experience I am thinking so some errors can be handled (related to database > usage) and others not - like syntax errors in PL/pgSQL or possible > assertions (although we can handle syntax error, but I don't think so it is > practical). It significantly increase a work that is necessary for error > identification. I think that's a fair point. Regards, Marko Tiikkaja
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: