Re: Name column
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Name column |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5224.1285343034@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Name column (André Fernandes<andre.de.camargo.fernandes@hotmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Name column
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
André Fernandes <andre.de.camargo.fernandes@hotmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> I'm starting to wonder if we should think about deprecating this
>> behavior. It is awfully confusing and unintuitive.
> I agree, it is very unintuitive.
> +1 for deprecating this behavior.
-1. There's nothing wrong with the function-as-a-computed-column
feature, and it seems likely that taking it away will break applications.
What we are getting bit by is that I/O coercions to string types can be
specified this way. Maybe what we ought to do is remove just that one
capability. It'd be a bit non-orthogonal, but seems fairly unlikely to
break anything, especially since we only began to allow such things
recently (in 8.4 looks like).
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: