Re: PLPGSQL and FOUND stange behaviour after EXECUTE
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PLPGSQL and FOUND stange behaviour after EXECUTE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5221.1096607658@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PLPGSQL and FOUND stange behaviour after EXECUTE (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PLPGSQL and FOUND stange behaviour after EXECUTE
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> ... One way to fix this would be to reimplement EXECUTE to
> be essentially `eval': it would take an arbitrary string and execute it
> as a PL/pgSQL statement. That would fix the FOUND problem, and also give
> us EXECUTE INTO in one fell swoop.
Yeah, this has been on my to-do list for awhile...
> (Rather than reimplementing EXECUTE, we might want to add this
> functionality as a new command -- "EVAL" might be a good name for it.)
That would give cover for the inevitable backward-compatibility
arguments anyway. One question here is whether Oracle's PL/SQL has a
precedent, and if so which way does it point?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: