On 8/24/22 13:11, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
> *Question 1: why does "pg_constraint" have a "connamespace" column?*
>
> I created this temporary view (using PG 14.4):
>
> *create temporary view all_constraints(t_owner, t_schema, t_name,
> c_name, same) as
> select
> r.rolname,
> s.nspname,
> c.relname,
> x.conname,
> (x.connamespace = c.relnamespace)
> from
> pg_class c
> inner join
> pg_roles r
> on c.relowner = r.oid
> inner join
> pg_namespace s
> on c.relnamespace = s.oid
> inner join pg_constraint x
> on c.oid = x.conrelid
> where c.relkind = 'r';
> *
>
> I created three tables, each with a user-created constraint. The tables
> also have implicitly created primary key constraints.
>
> Then I did this:
>
> *select count(*) from all_constraints;
> *
> It said that the count is over a hundred. (All but the rows for my three
> tables are for rows for tables in the "pg_catalog" schema.)
>
> Then I did this:
>
> *select exists(select 1 from all_constraints where not same)::text;
> *
> It said "false".
>
> Over one hundred seems to be a fair sample size. So it seems to be
> reasonable to assume that "pg_constraint.connamespace =
> pg_class.relnamespace" is always true. Ordinary common-sense analysis of
> the query suggests this too. If the hypothesis is right, then
> "connamespace" is simply a derived value. And this would be a departure
> from usual table design practice.
>
> What do you think?
>
create table c1 (id integer, constraint pk1 primary key(id));
CREATE TABLE
create table c2 (id integer, constraint pk1 primary key(id));
ERROR: relation "pk1" already exists
create table test.c2 (id integer, constraint pk1 primary key(id));
CREATE TABLE
select conname, connamespace from pg_constraint where conname = 'pk1';
conname | connamespace
---------+--------------
pk1 | 2200
pk1 | 59706
From:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/catalog-pg-constraint.html
conname name
Constraint name (not necessarily unique!)
So connamespace makes it unique.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com