Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 51DEF40B.1020305@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [PATCH] big test separation POC (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/11/2013 09:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Fabien COELHO escribió: > >> Note that this is really a POC. How to derive a file is under >> discussion: it has been suggested that the unix shell approach would >> not work on Windows. I've suggested perl or python (which version?) >> but I'm not sure that it is okay either. > > The other option, suggested by Andres somewhere, is to have a new > parameter to pg_regress, something like --run-serially. So you would > use the same parallel schedule file, but serially instead of following > the parallel specification. Ok, this sounds like it needs a *lot* of discussion before it's a patch.Marking "returned with feedback", and we'll discussit until September (or beyond). -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: