Re: plpython implementation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От james
Тема Re: plpython implementation
Дата
Msg-id 51D113BC.7000004@mansionfamily.plus.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plpython implementation  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: plpython implementation  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Re: plpython implementation  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
PL/Lua (was: plpython implementation)  (Luis Carvalho <lexcarvalho@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 01/07/2013 02:43, Claudio Freire wrote:
> In essence, you'd have to use another implementation. CPython guys
> have left it very clear they don't intend to "fix" that, as they don't
> consider it a bug. It's just how it is.
Given how useful it is to have a scripting language that can be used outside
of the database as well as inside it, would it be reasonable to consider
'promoting' pllua?

My understanding is that it (lua) is much cleaner under the hood (than 
CPython).
Although I do recognise that Python as a whole has always had more traction.





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC
Следующее
От: Claudio Freire
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plpython implementation