Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER
Дата
Msg-id 51D10BF2.6040701@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER  (ian link <ian@ilink.io>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 06/30/2013 08:54 PM, ian link wrote:
> I found some time and I think I am up to speed now. I finally figured out
> how to add new operator strategies and made a little test operator for
> myself.
> 
> It seems pretty clear that assuming '+' and '-' are addition and
> subtraction is a bad idea. I don't think it would be too tricky to add
> support for new operator strategies. Andrew Gierth suggested calling these
> new strategies "offset -" and "offset +", which I think describes it pretty
> well. I assigned the operator itself to be "@+" and "@-" but that can
> obviously be changed. If this sounds like a good path to you guys, I will
> go ahead and implement the operators for the appropriate types. Please let
> me know if I am misunderstanding something - I am still figuring stuff out
> :)
> 
> Aside from the opclass stuff, there were some other important issues
> mentioned with the original RANGE support. I think I will address those
> after the opclass stuff is done.

Are these things you plan to get done this week, or for next CommitFest?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC