Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]
Дата
Msg-id 51CA2F63.9060901@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Ответы Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I know it's heresy in these parts, but maybe we should consider
> adopting a non-spec syntax for this feature?  In particular, it's
> really un-obvious why the FILTER clause shouldn't be inside rather
> than outside the aggregate's parens, like ORDER BY.

Well, what other DBMSes support this feature?  Will being non-spec
introduce migration pain?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Possible bug in CASE evaluation
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Review: UNNEST (and other functions) WITH ORDINALITY