Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 51C428ED.10902@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/21/2013 05:32 PM, Hitoshi Harada wrote: > I also later found that we are missing not only notion of '+' or '-', > but also notion of 'zero value' in our catalog. Per spec, RANGE BETWEEN > needs to detect ERROR if the offset value is negative, but it is not > always easy if you think about interval, numeric types as opposed to > int64 used in ROWS BETWEEN. Zero can be tested for with `val = (@ val)` ie `val = abs(val)`. That should make sense for any type in which the concept of zero makes sense. Thanks for the warning on that issue. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: