Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Дата
Msg-id 51BB17E5.3060509@vmware.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 14.06.2013 16:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnakangas@vmware.com>  writes:
>> Well, time will tell I guess. The biggest overhead with the checksums is
>> exactly the WAL-logging of hint bits.
>
> Refresh my memory as to why we need to WAL-log hints for checksumming?

Torn pages:

1. Backend sets a hint bit, dirtying the buffer.
2. Checksum is calculated, and buffer is written out to disk.
3. <crash>

If the page is torn, the checksum won't match. Without checksums, a torn 
page is not a problem with hint bits, as a single bit can't be torn and 
the page is otherwise intact. But with checksums, it causes a checksum 
failure.

- Heikki



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup