Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51B41167.9030701@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/07/2013 01:00 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Daniel, > > So your suggestion is that if archiving is falling behind, we should > introduce delays on COMMIT in order to slow down the rate of WAL writing? Delaying commit wouldn't be enough; consider a huge COPY, which can produce a lot of WAL at a high rate without a convenient point to delay at. I expect a delay after writing an xlog record would make a more suitable write-rate throttle, though I'd want to be sure the extra branch didn't hurt performance significantly. Branch prediction hints would help; since we don't *care* if the delay branch is slow and causes pipeline stalls, tagging the no-delay branch as likely would probably deal with that concern for supported compilers/platforms. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: