Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51B115D6.1000603@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Redesigning checkpoint_segments (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> Given the behavior of xlog, I'd want to adjust the >> algo so that peak usage on a 24-hour basis would affect current >> preallocation. That is, if a site regularly has a peak from 2-3pm where >> they're using 180 segments/cycle, then they should still be somewhat >> higher at 2am than a database which doesn't have that peak. I'm pretty >> sure that the bgwriter's moving average cycles much shorter time scales >> than that. > > Makes sense. I didn't implement that in the attached, though. It's possible that it won't matter. Performance testing will tell us. > Having a separate option to specify a minimum number of segments (or > rather minimum size in MB) to keep preallocated would at least allow a > DBA to set that manually, based on the observed peak. I didn't implement > such a manual option in the attached, but that would be easy. Yeah, I'd really like to get away from adding manual options which need to be used in non-specialty cases. I think we'll need one at some point -- there are DB applications which are VERY bursty -- but let's not start there and see if we can make reasonable autotuning work. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: