Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 51A57F23.4060208@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/28/2013 07:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Perhaps just documenting the behavior is all that is needed, but -U is >> everywhere and I think that's a good thing. > > [ moved to hacker ] > > Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u. > Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4? I can keep supporting -u > as an undocumented option. Yes, -U makes the most sense as that is what is used with the other tools. I think you should just drop -u, this isn't something people are doing everyday (like psql). The backward compatibility argument is pretty slim. JD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: