Re: ODBC constructs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John R Pierce
Тема Re: ODBC constructs
Дата
Msg-id 519B0C04.8070102@hogranch.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ODBC constructs  (Dev Kumkar <devdas.kumkar@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: ODBC constructs  (Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 5/20/2013 10:11 PM, Dev Kumkar wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com> wrote:

If you wish to work in C,then,I would suggest libpq.I would wait for more replies on this,as I have little knowledge
about psqlODBC.

Thanks for the comments. Yes objective is to work in C and found libpq useful but am not sure about psqlODBC.
It would be really great to get comments from community here regarding comparison between both of them and also performance perspective. Based on my reading so far libpq is good from performance perspective.

libpq lets you talk directly to postgres in its native tongue.

ODBC implements a sort of abstraction.     IMHO, its like trying to type with mittens on.





-- 
john r pierce                                      37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dev Kumkar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ODBC constructs
Следующее
От: Daniel Migowski
Дата:
Сообщение: Cross compile custom data types for Linux and windows