Re: Cluster problem
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Cluster problem | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5197.1038176586@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Cluster problem ("Andrew Bartley" <abartley@evolvosystems.com>) | 
| Список | pgsql-general | 
"Andrew Bartley" <abartley@evolvosystems.com> writes:
> select oid, * from pg_class where relname = 'fish'
> 4289092798
> select max(oid) from pg_class
> 4289092798
> Looks like it has not wrapped.
... but you're within hailing distance of a wrap; that's very nearly 4G.
I wonder whether you are consuming OIDs fast enough that you already
wrapped, and are approaching your second (or Nth) wraparound.
How many tables do you actually have (select count(*) from pg_class)?
It could be that this is just the expected post_wrap behavior:
occasional OID conflicts due to regeneration of the same OID value.
However, unless you have a heckuva lot of pg_class entries I'd expect
the probability of a conflict to be mighty small, so I'm surprised that
you are seeing conflicts often enough to complain about it.
            regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: