Re: Thinking About Correlated Columns (again)
| От | Gavin Flower |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Thinking About Correlated Columns (again) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5193ECC6.4080901@archidevsys.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Thinking About Correlated Columns (again) (Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Thinking About Correlated Columns (again)
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On 16/05/13 04:23, Craig James wrote:
[...]On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com> wrote:[Inefficient plans for correlated columns] has been a pain point for quite a while. While we've had several discussions in the area, it always seems to just kinda trail off and eventually vanish every time it comes up.
Actually far worse: N!/(N - K)!K! summed over K=1...N, assuming the order of columns in the correlation is unimportant (otherwise it is N factorial) - based on my hazy recollection of the relevant maths...
It's a very hard problem. There's no way you can keep statistics about all possible correlations since the number of possibilities is O(N^2) with the number of columns.
[...]
Cheers,
Gavin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: