On 5/14/13 7:50 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> writes:
>> > all: sql/$(EXTENSION)--$(EXTVERSION).sql
>> >
>> > sql/$(EXTENSION)--$(EXTVERSION).sql: sql/$(EXTENSION).sql
>> > cp $< $@
> That's a recipe for problems. Each time I meet with such a construct in
> an extension's Makefile I propose an hard coded alternative. We're
> speaking of maintaining less than half a dozen file names here, with one
> or two additions per year, in most cases.
I don't think this in particular is a problem. I use something like
that myself. But you should list all the older extension upgrade files
explicitly (to which your point applies).