Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5175.1160506244@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Re: more anti-postgresql FUD Re: more anti-postgresql FUD Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> * MySQL is used as a primary development platform.
> Another good reason.
Actually that's *the* reason --- it's always going to be hard for
Postgres to look good for an application that's been designed/optimized
for MySQL. The application has already made whatever compromises it
had to for that platform, and dropping it onto a different DB won't
magically undo them.
Some days I think database independence is a myth.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: