Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 517075.1600457478@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What I now propose is to add two output columns:
>>
>> barelabel bool (t or f, obviously)
>> baredesc text ("can be bare label" or "requires AS", possibly localized)
> That might be over-engineered in a vacuum, but it seems like it may be
> cleaner to stick with the existing precedent than to diverge from it.
Yeah, my recollection of the pg_get_keywords design is that we couldn't
agree on whether to emit a machine-friendly description or a
human-friendly one, so we compromised by doing both :-(. But the same
factors exist with this addition --- you can make an argument for
preferring either boolean or text output.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: