Re: [GSOC] questions about idea "rewrite pg_dump as library"
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GSOC] questions about idea "rewrite pg_dump as library" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5165C491.8080508@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [GSOC] questions about idea "rewrite pg_dump as library" (帅 <shuai900217@126.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GSOC] questions about idea "rewrite pg_dump as
library"
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/10/13 10:54 AM, ˧ wrote: > I'm interested in the idea "Rewrite (add) pg_dump and pg_restore > utilities as libraries (.so, .dll & .dylib)". The pg_dump code is a giant mess, and refactoring it as a library is perhaps not a project for a new hacker. Independent of that, I think the first consideration in such a project would be, who else would be using that library? What are the use cases?And then come up with an interface around that, andthen see about refactoring pg_dump. I think the main uses cases mentioned in connection with this idea are usually in the direction of finer-grained control over what gets dumped and how. But making pg_dump into a library would not necessarily address that.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: