Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ?
| От | Franck Routier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 515ED7BC.40907@axege.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ?
Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ? Re: What happens between end of explain analyze and end of query execution ? |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Le 04/04/2013 21:08, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Franck Routier <franck.routier@axege.com> writes:
>> The request is not using any function. It looks like this:
>> [ unexciting query ]
> Hmph. Can't see any reason for that to take a remarkably long time to
> plan. Can you put together a self-contained test case demonstrating
> excessive planning time? What PG version is this, anyway?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
Well, I don't know how to reproduce, as it is really only happening on
this database.
What I notice is that removing joins has a huge impact on the time
explain takes to return:
The full query takes 2.6 seconds to return. Notice it has dropped from
3.6 seconds to 2.6 since yesterday after I did a vacuum analyze on the
tables that go into the request.
EXPLAIN SELECT *
FROM sanrss
LEFT JOIN sanrum ON sanrum.sanrum___rforefide =
sanrss.sanrss___rforefide AND sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide =
sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide AND sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside = sanrss.sanrsside
LEFT JOIN sanact ON sanact.sanact___rforefide =
sanrum.sanrum___rforefide AND sanact.sanact___rfovsnide =
sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide AND sanact.sanact___sanrsside =
sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide =
sanrum.sanrumide AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide IS NOT NULL AND
sanact.sanact___rsanopide='CCAM'
LEFT JOIN sandia ON sandia.sandia___rforefide =
sanrum.sanrum___rforefide AND sandia.sandia___rfovsnide =
sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide AND sandia.sandia___sanrsside =
sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside AND sandia.sandia___sanrumide =
sanrum.sanrumide AND sandia.sandiasig=1
LEFT JOIN saneds ON sanrss.sanrss___rforefide =
saneds.saneds___rforefide AND sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide =
saneds.saneds___rfovsnide AND sanrss.sanrss___sanedside = saneds.sanedside
LEFT JOIN rsaidp ON saneds.saneds___rforefide =
rsaidp.rsaidp___rforefide AND saneds.saneds___rsaidpide = rsaidp.rsaidpide
WHERE sanrss.sanrss___rforefide = 'CHCL' AND
sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide = '201012_600' AND sanrss.sanrsside = '1188100'
ORDER BY sanrum.sanrumord, sanrum.sanrumide
==> 2.6 seconds
If I remove the join on either table 'sandia' or table 'saneds', the
explain return in 1.2 seconds. If I remove both, explain returns in 48ms.
EXPLAIN SELECT *
FROM sanrss
LEFT JOIN sanrum ON sanrum.sanrum___rforefide =
sanrss.sanrss___rforefide AND sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide =
sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide AND sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside = sanrss.sanrsside
LEFT JOIN sanact ON sanact.sanact___rforefide =
sanrum.sanrum___rforefide AND sanact.sanact___rfovsnide =
sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide AND sanact.sanact___sanrsside =
sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide =
sanrum.sanrumide AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide IS NOT NULL AND
sanact.sanact___rsanopide='CCAM'
LEFT JOIN saneds ON sanrss.sanrss___rforefide =
saneds.saneds___rforefide AND sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide =
saneds.saneds___rfovsnide AND sanrss.sanrss___sanedside = saneds.sanedside
LEFT JOIN rsaidp ON saneds.saneds___rforefide =
rsaidp.rsaidp___rforefide AND saneds.saneds___rsaidpide = rsaidp.rsaidpide
WHERE sanrss.sanrss___rforefide = 'CHCL' AND
sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide = '201012_600' AND sanrss.sanrsside = '1188100'
ORDER BY sanrum.sanrumord, sanrum.sanrumide
==> 1.2 seconds
EXPLAIN SELECT *
FROM sanrss
LEFT JOIN sanrum ON sanrum.sanrum___rforefide =
sanrss.sanrss___rforefide AND sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide =
sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide AND sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside = sanrss.sanrsside
LEFT JOIN sanact ON sanact.sanact___rforefide =
sanrum.sanrum___rforefide AND sanact.sanact___rfovsnide =
sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide AND sanact.sanact___sanrsside =
sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide =
sanrum.sanrumide AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide IS NOT NULL AND
sanact.sanact___rsanopide='CCAM'
LEFT JOIN sandia ON sandia.sandia___rforefide =
sanrum.sanrum___rforefide AND sandia.sandia___rfovsnide =
sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide AND sandia.sandia___sanrsside =
sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside AND sandia.sandia___sanrumide =
sanrum.sanrumide AND sandia.sandiasig=1
WHERE sanrss.sanrss___rforefide = 'CHCL' AND
sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide = '201012_600' AND sanrss.sanrsside = '1188100'
ORDER BY sanrum.sanrumord, sanrum.sanrumide
==> 1.2 seconds
EXPLAIN SELECT *
FROM sanrss
LEFT JOIN sanrum ON sanrum.sanrum___rforefide =
sanrss.sanrss___rforefide AND sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide =
sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide AND sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside = sanrss.sanrsside
LEFT JOIN sanact ON sanact.sanact___rforefide =
sanrum.sanrum___rforefide AND sanact.sanact___rfovsnide =
sanrum.sanrum___rfovsnide AND sanact.sanact___sanrsside =
sanrum.sanrum___sanrsside AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide =
sanrum.sanrumide AND sanact.sanact___sanrumide IS NOT NULL AND
sanact.sanact___rsanopide='CCAM'
WHERE sanrss.sanrss___rforefide = 'CHCL' AND
sanrss.sanrss___rfovsnide = '201012_600' AND sanrss.sanrsside = '1188100'
ORDER BY sanrum.sanrumord, sanrum.sanrumide
==> 48 ms
Maybe the statistics tables for sandia and saneds are in a bad shape ?
(don't know how to check this).
Regards,
Franck
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: