Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL)
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 515085E7.9020208@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should
array_length() Return NULL)
Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, > No, it *isn't* a good idea. GUCs that change application-visible > semantics are dangerous. We should have learned this lesson by now. Really? I thought that standard_conforming_strings was a great example of how to ease our users into a backwards-compatibility break. My thought was that we change the behavior in 9.4, provide a backwards-compatible GUC with warnings in the logs for two versions, and then take the GUC away. Whether that's worth the effort, though, is a question of how many people are going to be affected by the compatibility break. Maybe I can do a survey. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: