Re: small exclusion constraints patch
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: small exclusion constraints patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5141.1275228106@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: small exclusion constraints patch (Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>) |
| Ответы |
Re: small exclusion constraints patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: > On 2010-05-30 06:55 +0300, Robert Haas wrote: >> I've often wished for the ability to constrain a tale to hold just one >> row, so I don't find that use case implausible at all. > As I pointed out in > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01177.php , you > can already do that. Yes. This is NOT about constraining a table to hold only one row. It's about requiring all its rows to hold the same value (in some column(s)), without predetermining exactly which value that will be. I think the use-case for that is really extremely narrow. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: