Re: Unique is non unique; no nulls

Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Razvan Costea-Barlutiu" <cbrazvan@laitek.com> writes:
>> This has way too many ramifications for me to follow so I do appreciate some
>> guidance.

> What do the outputs of these queries say?

It would also be interesting to know whether REINDEXing the table
succeeds and if so whether the behavior gets any saner.

            regards, tom lane