Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)
Дата
Msg-id 513E090B.1080703@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> The remote end has entirely misinterpreted the day vs month fields.
> Now, to hit this you need to be using a datestyle which will print
> in an ambiguous format, so the "ISO" and "Postgres" styles are
> not vulnerable; but "German" and "SQL" are.

Is the "timezone" GUC a problem, also, for this?  Seems like that could
be much worse ...

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Materialized View patch broke pg_dump
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: transforms