Re: Proposed changes to security.html
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposed changes to security.html |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5133AD4D.3050407@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposed changes to security.html (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-www |
> That might be worthwhile consideration for introductory or marketing > material, say, but for the purpose of tracking security issues, > "contrib" is perfectly clear: If you are installing from source, it is > code that lives under contrib/. If you are installing from binary, it > is code that is in the postgresql-contrib package (usually). Calling it > anything other than "contrib" cannot possibly make that more clear. Yeah, I suppose the security page is not the place to address this. We have a larger project problem in using three different bits of terminology for mostly the same set of software. We can fix the security page once we fix the terminology in general. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: